Alice and her friends answer questions that you don’t want to ask your preceptor, peer, or colleagues regarding your career in science. Send your questions to Alice’s attention via .
“By forbidding you to establish any degree of independence, [your adviser] is intentionally blocking your career. His behavior is unethical. You should not honor his prohibition.”
I am a foreign national, currently in my sixth year as a postdoc, and I expect to win permanent residency soon. I recently started applying for faculty positions, but I haven’t heard back from most of them, and the replies I have received were negative. I have published 12 papers so far and will publish at least two more in the next few months.
The problem seems to be that I do not have a grant of my own. I applied for postdoctoral grants a couple of years ago but was told I was overqualified because I was in the fourth year of my postdoc and already had eight papers. Program officers suggested I apply for faculty positions instead. I also applied for a couple of low-budget foundation grants, but those applications were unsuccessful.
Most of the funding agencies require that I already have a faculty position in order to apply for grants, while faculty recruitment committees prefer candidates who already have a grant. It’s a chicken-or-egg situation. I have no way of making them understand that people from outside the United States have limited opportunities to get independent funding due to their immigration status, which, in turn, severely cripples any opportunity to get a faculty appointment. I am aware that the National Institutes of Health (NIH), since late last year, allows nonresidents and noncitizens to apply for R03 and R21 grants—but they require significant preliminary data and publications in the field of proposal. That’s a problem for me because my principal investigator (PI) prohibits postdocs from working on anything that he is not working on.
I am in dire need of help and advice at this juncture.
There are few immigration-status restrictions on research grants from the major funding agencies and they do not require that you have a faculty position. If you have the full support of your institution, you can, if you wish, apply not just for an R03 or an R21 but even for a full R01 grant. The key phrase there, though, is “full support of your institution.” A common approach is for senior postdocs to get a small promotion to a position from which they can write grants and fund their own research. The support of a faculty adviser is usually essential. You, it seems, don’t have that.
That leaves fellowships—but most U.S. postdoc fellowships are federal, and most federal fellowships are open only to citizens or permanent residents. An important exception is transition awards like the K99/ROO award offered by NIH. These start out as postdoc fellowships (K99) then morph into research grants (R00). In contrast to most postdoc fellowships, there is no citizenship requirement. The only restriction related to your immigration status is that you must be eligible to stay in the United States for the award’s duration. But there’s one more eligibility requirement that defeats you: You must be within 4 years of receiving your terminal degree.
The big issue here—much bigger than independent funding—is your unsupportive adviser, who seems to view you (and the other postdocs in the lab) as instruments for his own success rather than as protégés whose career success he is responsible for. By forbidding you to establish any degree of independence, he is intentionally blocking your career. His behavior is unethical. You should not honor his prohibition.
You will not succeed at establishing independence as a researcher in this laboratory. So go find another lab—a new postdoc or a research associate position, with a better PI or adviser. Your chance of finding another job may be highest with colleagues or competitors of your current adviser. It is high time to get out of your current position.