“What’s it like to work in such a dry, staid laboratory environment?” I once asked Stephen D. Ginsberg, a neuroscientist at the Center for Dementia Research at the Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (NKI) in Orangeburg, New York, where I also work as a researcher in psychology. “I work in a wet lab, not a dry one,” he retorted.
As head of an NKI laboratory with seven to 10 scientists and as a faculty member in the departments of psychiatry and physiology and neuroscience at the New York University School of Medicine in New York City, Ginsberg is a productive scientist who has fashioned a uniquely lighthearted workplace.
“A scientific laboratory is a culture of failure,” he explained in that same conversation, leaving me wondering for a moment whether he was being funny. “Most of our grant applications don’t get funded, and most of our papers get rejected on the first submission.” Ginsberg doesn’t mourn. Instead, he told me, he announces to his group, “Well, we just got another one rejected.”
“With the NIA funding pay line half of what it was less than 5 years ago, hovering somewhere around 10%, you have to have a sense of humor to keep the team motivated, maintain perspective, and stay grounded,” adds Ginsberg. (NIA is the National Institute on Aging in Bethesda, Maryland, one of Ginsberg’s main funding agencies.) He compares his role as a lab manager to that of a baseball coach who brings the team together by employing good-natured “locker room” humor.
So in Ginsberg’s lab, if someone drops a beaker, it’s not long before everyone is mailing a photo of the incident around, in case anyone missed it. “This isn’t a corporate environment, and we can be a little looser,” he says. “People get to know each other over time, and we know how to make each other laugh.” On a few occasions, his approach won him bananas and old slices of pizza, sent in the U.S. mail, from old colleagues who share his warped wit.
He who laughed first
“Our ancestors were laughing long before they were talking,” says David Sloan Wilson, a professor of biological sciences and director of the Evolutionary Studies Program at Binghamton University in New York state. In his latest book,, Wilson traces the evolutionary origin of humor over the past 7 million years, noting that apes engage in “tickling and chasing games accompanied by a facial expression and panting sounds very similar to human laughter.”
“The original (and continuing) function of laughter is to create and coordinate a safety and playfulness that is essential for the development of human and social capital,” Wilson writes in an e-mail. Laughter is contagious, he says, which enables members of a group to feel the same way at the same time. By fostering a feeling of mutual camaraderie, humor helps develop a sense of teamwork.
“Laughter is highly relevant to scientific inquiry because it creates a safe and playful atmosphere for intellectual development,” Wilson says. “My lab group is always laughing and joking around as we are doing our work.”
Unfortunately, not all laboratories embody the same joie de vivre as the Ginsberg and Wilson groups do–or any other joie de vivre. Wilson is familiar–as most scientists are–with “labs that are run on the principle of competition, creating an atmosphere of pressure, secrecy, noncooperation, and mistrust,” he says. “It would be interesting to know which kind of atmosphere is more productive and creative over the long run. It’s obvious which kind is more pleasant on a day-to-day basis.”
The case for laughter
Although there is no hard evidence linking laughter to scientific productivity, research does suggest that humor can relieve tension, reduce burnout, improve morale, enhance cooperation, and even lower blood pressure. “Laughter is an inner treadmill that breaks negativity instantly by releasing endorphins and reducing stress,” Debbie Mandel, a stress-management expert, writes in an e-mail. “A funny face or a bit of silliness at work reminds us not to take ourselves so seriously. When we are more at ease, we can better solve problems.”
How-to (and how-not-to)
It is important to differentiate between good and bad humor, Mandel says. “Laughter crosses the line when it disintegrates into sarcastic barbs that mock appearance, core values, race, religion, politics, intellect, or makes sexual innuendos,” she says. “These barbs reduce the victim’s status and undermine self-esteem. Sarcasm causes divisiveness while good humor creates camaraderie.” Creating an environment of laughter generally isn’t about telling off-color, canned jokes but rather is about people interacting and spontaneously finding fun in their everyday experiences.
“Overdosing on seriousness is even worse than having a caffeine headache or ice cream brain freeze,” Judy Gruen, humorist and author of, writes in an e-mail. Here are some practical guidelines to stimulate your funny bone and make sure it doesn’t get you into trouble:
Master the art. Tell laboratory “war stories” with a humorous punch, read humorous quotes or stories so you have something light to share with colleagues, listen for relevant humor and delivery styles on the late-night talk shows, and appreciate the value of a good laugh.
Use it or lose it. When making formal presentations to scientific groups, begin with a relevant joke or PowerPoint cartoon to narrow the distance between you and your audience. When Ginsberg participates in poster sessions each year at Society for Neuroscience meetings, he playfully incorporates pictures of his children.
Use humor to bring your group together. When I worked at the National Institute of Mental Health in Bethesda, Maryland, and we celebrated a milestone birthday of a supervisor, we created a video documenting why the people in his life–such as his secretary, his mechanic, his dry cleaner, and his wife–were fond of him.
Don’t overdo. Don’t make the mistake of clogging your colleagues’ inboxes with unwanted e-jokes that verge on spam. And although we all want to make memorable presentations, never let your role as a comedian outshine your role as a scientist.
Know your audience. Never offend by making insensitive jokes. A postdoc told (on the Science Careers forum) the story of a student who found a $20 bill on the floor of the lab. She informed everyone of her find, but no one claimed the money. Later that day, the principal investigator (PI) said jokingly that the bill must be his because he was the only one earning any money there. Most of the postdocs took offense. Although the money went to the student, the story about the PI was remembered long after.
Laugh. “Don’t try to be what you are not,” cautions Gruen. “If you are not known for having a sense of humor, tread lightly. Be a laugher rather than a joker. Any effort to be funny that falls flat or that appears like you are trying too hard will only evince wincing among your co-workers. Do what feels comfortable but try to lighten up,” she says.