Career advice highlights from the EuroScience Open Forum


MANCHESTER, U.K.—Researchers from all corners of Europe have flocked to the biennial EuroScience Open Forum this week, where experts are showcasing scientific developments in a broad range of fields and discussing science policy issues—plus offering career guidance. Here are Science Careers’s takeaways from three of the careers sessions.

“Life after a PhD: Engaging supervisors in career development”

Young scientists should initiate conversations about their career plans with their supervisors, even when these aspirations deviate from a traditional academic path, emphasized the speakers at this session organized by Careers Advisers supporting Researchers in Europe. Trainees often fear starting these discussions because they worry that their principal investigators (PIs) will not be supportive, and that it could affect their working relationship. But, the speakers said, PIs are realizing more and more the importance of talking with their advisees about career aspirations, including those outside academia, and trainees often find that the conversation comes as a relief to both themselves and their PIs. Still, you need to navigate these discussions carefully. Here are the speakers’ tips for getting the most out of them. 

  1. PIs often struggle to give feedback to trainees who want to leave academia because they may not know what else you should or could do. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t talk to them about it, but if your PI has no experience or contacts in the areas you’re interested in, find other mentors who do.

“Peer review: the nuts and bolts”

The peer-review landscape has changed rapidly in recent years, presenting new opportunities but also potential pitfalls for young scientists, said the speakers at this session organized by Sense about Science. Editorial and publishing consultant Irene Hames offered some advice about how to navigate the waters as a reviewer.

  1. If you are co-reviewing with your supervisor, make sure the journal knows about it so that you can get credit for your work and start building your own record.

“Opening up in the digital era: empowering early career researchers”

In the midst of a push toward open science, today’s researchers have at their disposal more tools than ever before to share their data and protocols, mine the scientific literature, and spread the word about their research. In a session organized by Elsevier and conducted with the participation of the U.K.-based researcher professional development organization Vitae, among others, speakers highlighted a number of these tools and offered advice for how to go about incorporating them into your day-to-day work.

  1. For literature discovery, tools such as Scizzle, Sparrho, SciCurve, and Meta can be useful, in addition to Twitter.

Some of these tools are free, while others require a fee, and there can be a bit of a learning curve involved in getting started. Which tools you should use often depends on your scientific field and discipline, so rather than testing them all, check out what your colleagues are using—perhaps by using an information crowdsourcing platform like LabWorm. You can also learn more at the Mendeley group Open Science toolkit for ECRs (or Early-Career Researchers), which was launched during the session.

Low math confidence discourages female students from pursuing STEM disciplines

In maledominated subjects, hiring favors women—for teachers in France